Niagara County Horticulture News

Winter Edition 2000


Table of Contents


Pesticide Clarification Changes on Horizon

N.Y.S. D.E.C. reports they will begin phasing in some revisions in pesticide licensing requirements in the coming year. One aspect involves recertification credits. It appears private applicators will be required to accumulate 12 credits as opposed to the 10 currently specified. As a member of Cornell Cooperative Extension you can pick up at least 6 credits per year for free by attending our local trainings. The next opportunity is March 9th from 1 - 4pm or 7 - 10pm. It is not too early to reserve a spot by calling 433-2651.

Note: It is unlikely that the 12 credit requirement will affect those who are coming up on recertification soon. This will be phased in over a period of time.

 Table of Contents


Bedding Plants School February 1, 2000

The annual Bedding Plants School will take place on February 1, 2000 in Batavia, at the Holiday Inn. A few agenda topics include: latest research on pest management; biological control and how to make it work; spring bulb production; and an informative series on "risk" management in the greenhouse business. There will also be a trade show.

 Table of Contents


Some Integrated Pest Management Control Methods Part II: Managing Resistance to Insecticides

Editor's Note: This paper is from the Pesticide Applicator Training Manual: Commodity Area - Greenhouse and Florist, 1994, and slightly modified for the purpose of this publication. From time to time it is good to have a general overview and review of the IPM control methods. We trust this information will be informative to you and your employees. You may want to post this or pass it on to staff so everyone will be familiar with the various IPM control methods. This paper is a three-part series. Part I reviewed control methods. Part II will review managing resistance to insecticides. Part III will review biological techniques, cultural techniques and mechanical techniques.

Managing Resistance to Insecticides
Insecticide resistance is a major concern for chemical control of almost all the important greenhouse arthropod pests. A combination of factors - the biology of the pests, the intensity of chemical use in the past and the present, aspects of the greenhouse environment, and commercial production practices - has led to insecticide resistance problems. The following suggestions should be considered for any chemical control program.

  1. Minimize insecticide use - If pest control relies exclusively on synthetic insecticides, then resistance is likely to occur. Therefore, the use of nonchemical control tactics (sanitation, weed elimination, soil sterilization, screening vents, natural enemies) should be maximized, and chemicals should be used sparingly.
  2. Avoid persistent applications - Ideally, an effective insecticide should be applied at a concentration high enough (but not exceeding label limits) to kill all individuals in a population; then it should quickly disappear. Pesticides which instead degrade slowly overtime eventually are present as low concentrations that will kill only the most susceptible individuals. When only the weak individuals are removed from a population, only resistant individuals are left to reproduce and create an even more resistant population. After application of pesticide dosages, which are too low, just a few highly resistant survivors can rapidly repopulate an infested greenhouse. Aerosol formulations that apply a short burst of a high insecticide concentration and do not leave much residue may select for resistance more slowly than full-coverage sprays of the same insecticide, as long as resistance to the insecticide has not already developed in the population.
  3. Avoid tank mixes of more than one pesticide - A mixture of two insecticides may provide much greater short-term control than either insecticide used alone, but there is a danger in the long-term use of insecticide mixtures. The assumption behind the use of tank mixes is that if individual pests resistant to one of the pesticides in a tank mix are rare in the population, there is little chance that resistance mechanisms to both pesticides would occur together in any one individual. If by chance individuals do exist with resistance mechanisms to both chemicals, then continued use of the tank mix will begin to select for these doubly resistant pests. Chemical control would then become much more difficult, because the pests would be resistant to multiple classes of insecticides.
  4. Use long-term insecticide rotations - The pesticides used in a rotation scheme should have different modes of action against the pest (i.e., they should be of different chemical classes), and resistance to the chemicals should be at a low level. For example, organophospate and carbamate insecticides have similar modes of action and they should not be alternated in an insecticide rotation scheme. Use each effective insecticide for at least the duration of one generation of the pest before rotating to a different insecticide. If two insecticides are used within the same pest generation, the selection effect will be essentially the same as using a tank mix. This is because the same individuals would come into contact with both insecticides, although at slightly different times. To minimize the problems of overlapping generations and persistent insecticide residues, it might be wise to use the same insecticide for two or even three generations prior to rotating.
  5. Use pesticides with non-specific modes of action - Both insecticidal soaps and horticultural oils have broad modes of action, and it is therefore unlikely that resistance will occur to either of these. In addition, tank mixes of these materials with effective synthetic organic insecticides might delay resistance to the synthetic insecticide because the soap or oil will kill many individuals that are resistant to the insecticide. Some tank mixes that include oil or soap may be toxic to certain plants. Growers should test these mixes on a few plants before treating the entire crop.
  6. Integrate chemical and biological control - Insecticides applied to control insect pests can also harm or eliminate populations of beneficial insects which have been purposefully introduced into a greenhouse. Research has identified many insecticides that can be compatible with the use of beneficial insects. The effective use of beneficial insects can add an additional mortality factor that does not select for resistance and may conserve the effectiveness of insecticides. Many Extension entomologists and commercial insectaries have information on pesticides that are compatible with beneficial insects.

By: Ralph Freeman, Cornell Cooperative Extension

 Table of Contents


Conserve for Thrips

The insecticide, Conserve SC Turf and Ornamental (EPA Reg. 627-19-291) has been registered in New York State adding "greenhouse", "lathhouse", and "shadehouse" uses. The active ingredient is spinosad, a fermentation product derived from a soil micoorganism. It has a unique mode of action and is probably the most effective insecticide currently available for western flower thrips management in greenhouses. It is also effective against lepidopterous larvae (butterfly and moth caterpillars) and serpentine leafminers. Although it is labeled for spider mites, control has been inconsistent.

Trials at the Long Island Research and Extension Center showed excellent results against cabbage looper in flowering cabbage. It should also perform very well against other worm pests in this crop. Growers may also want to consider using this material for control of European corn borer in mums as spinosad has had good efficacy against this pest in other corps. Growers are urged to read the label carefully and follow all recommended use. The REI is 4 hours. Dan Gilrein at the LIHREC has tested repeat applications at high rates on ivy geraniums, Petunias, and other crops in bloom with no phytotoxicity. As with other new materials, each grower should perform a small test to verify plant safety in his or her own operation.

By: Ralph Freeman

 Table of Contents

The Year In Review

Although this data was generated in Ithaca, it is fairly representative of what we experienced. The 1999 growing season was definitely hotter and drier than normal.

Weather
Two words could sum up our weather this year: hot and dry. Although we started the growing season in March with above normal precipitation, that quickly changed. Winter was generally mild throughout the state, so much so that on Long Island people felt as they skipped winter altogether. Below are some highlights of the weather in Ithaca according to Northeast Regional Climate Center at Cornell.

March, 1999

April, 1999 May, 1999 June, 1999 July, 1999 August, 1999 Growing Degree Days
Growing degree-days started out fairly close to the average. This April we had 4GDD50 on April 1st and the average (from 1993-1997) on that date is 2.6 GDD50 This is in comparison to last year when the average for April 15 we were already at 105 GDD50 when the average for April 15 was 7 GDD50.

The average for May 1st had been 50 GDD50 and this year we had only reached 27 GDD50 by May 1. We were slightly above average from mid-May on. June 1 was 310 GDD50 this year, (Average is 217 GDD50 ). On July 1 there was 825 GDD50 (Average year is 712 GDD50).

Disease and Insect Incidence
This was certainly a quiet year for leaf diseases. Our lack of rain during the critical period when primary inoculum from most leaf pathogens is produced explains this situation. There were basically few good infection periods this year. Delayed spore dispersal allowed more twig and foliage growth to pass through its succulent and presumably more susceptible stage, thus lessening disease incidence.

While leaf diseases were minimal because of dry conditions, those same dry conditions caused problems as well. Drought stress caused marginal scorching, early fall color, and leaf drop on many trees throughout the state, especially maples.

There were a couple of new diseases (at least for us they were new) this growing season. They were:

In matters of interest in the insect world, viburnum leaf beetle continues to spread in New York State. It is now in 25 counties. The new counties it was found in this year are: Tompkins, Onondaga, Yates, Cortland, Oneida, Madison, Essex, Clinton, Steuben, Wyoming, Chautauqua. Based on the rapid spread through much of New York, it would appear that northern Ohio and Pennsylvania may soon have problems with this insect. There is a new color fact sheet on the viburnum leaf beetle, which will be available this winter. Check with your local Cooperative Extension for availability and pricing.

Source: Branching Out, Cornell University

 Table of Contents

The Letter K - Potassium

Potassium (K) is an essential element for all living organisms. This monovalent cation (an ion with a single positive charge) is the most important cation in relation to its content in plant tissue and with respect to its physiological and biochemical functions. Next to nitrogen (N), it is the mineral nutrient needed in the largest amount and is involved in water relations, disease and old resistance, and maintaining the pH and charge balance in the cytoplasm.

Importance of Potassium
Potassium is the most abundant cation in the cytoplasm. Its effect on the plant's water status is well known due to its ability to regulate the osmotic potential of the cell. Water moves from a high potential to a low potential. If the salt concentration in the cell increases, the water potential of the cell decreases and water will move into the cell. So, when K accumulates in a cell or tissue the reduction in the osmotic potential causes water to move in that direction. This process aids in water uptake if K accumulates in the xylem and reduces water loss when the K concentration increases in the leaf's mesophyll cells.

Potassium regulates transpiration in a similar way by its effect on the osmotic potential of the guard cell (those two cells that create the stomas or pores in the leaf). Light stimulates pumping of K into guard cells which increases water uptake. When guard cells are turgid they bend in such a way that an opening is created between the two guard cells, resulting in uptake of carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and water loss through transpiration. The process is reversed in the dark which stimulates pumping of K out of the guard cells, resulting in the stomates closing.

Potassium also stabilizes the cytoplasm pH between 7 and 8 which is optimal for most enzyme reactions such as nitrate reductase. Potassium is highly coupled to metabolic activity such as starch and protein synthesis, cell extension, and photosynthesis. For optimal growth, K is needed in the 2-5% range of plant dry weight of vegetative parts, fleshy fruits, and tubers.

Sources of Potassium
The average K content of the earth's crust is about 2.3%. Most of the K is bound in primary minerals or present in secondary clay minerals. Generally, soils rich in clay are also rich in K. While clay soils may be rich in K, organic soils are generally low in K, in the order of 0.03%.

The main source of K for plants comes from the weathering of K containing minerals such as alkali feldspars, muscovite (K mica), biotite (Mg mica), and illite, among others. The rate and extent of release of K by weathering is dependent on its concentration and the structure of the mineral. Potassium fixation can also occur and high quantities of fertilizer K can be rendered unavailable.

Soil clay content is not only important for K release and fixation but also considerably influences K's mobility. Clay minerals differ in their selectivity. Soils rich in K specific binding sites decrease K mobility and diffusion rates. Under these conditions, leaching of K is minimal. In sandy and organic soils, leaching rates may be considerable higher suggesting that K fertilization be carried out in the spring rather than the fall or winter to prevent winter leaching.

Potassium can be divided up into three fractions: K as a structural element of soil minerals, K absorbed in exchangeable form to soil colloids such as clay minerals and organic matter, and K present in the soil solution. While the fraction of K in the soil solution makes up only a small percentage of the exchangeable fraction, it is by far the most important fraction in relation to plant supply.

Potassium Uptake and Translocation
Since potassium is needed and taken up by plant tissues at a high rate, the plant depends on an active uptake mechanism in the roots. There is evidence that of all the essential mineral cation species, K is the only one which can be translocated against a gradient into plant cells. Potassium in the plant is very mobile and its main transport direction is towards the meristematic (region of high cell division) tissues. This high mobility means potassium can be imported from the oldest leaves to these growth areas resulting in the initial deficiency symptoms showing on the older leaves.

Deficiency Symptoms
Potassium deficiency doesn't show up immediately in visible symptoms. Plant metabolism changes include reduced growth rate of the cambium, accumulation of sugars, decrease in starch, and accumulation of soluble nitrogen compounds. Since potassium plays a major role in plant water relations, deficiency results in decreased turgor and reduced resistance to water stress. Therefore, resistance to drought is poor. Affected plants are more susceptible to frost injury, ripening disorders and tuber quality as well as fungal attack and saline conditions. Depending on the severity of the deficiency and light levels, older deficient leaves become chlorotic and necrotic beginning in the margins and leaf tips.

When plants are deficient, increasing K levels to roots will easily increase the K concentration of various organs.

Potassium Fertilization
Potassium can be applied as part of a complete fertilizer or in the form of a compound. This nutrient is the third number on a fertilizer bag and is expressed as percent K20. Potassium chloride (KC1), better known as muriate of potash is the most widely used and cheapest K fertilizer. Other K sources include potassium sulfate (K2SO4 . 43% K), potassium nitrate (KNO3. 37% K and 13% N), and potassium magnesium sulfate (K2SO4 and MgSO4. 18% K and 11% Mg). Wood ashes and manure are two organic sources that are good K sources.

Potassium chloride breaks down to K and C1 ions in the soil solution. Chlorogpytic species, plants sensitive to C1, such as grapes, fruit trees, cotton, sugar cane, and potatoes can be fertilized with one of the other types of K sources such as K2SO4. Potassium nitrate also contributes nitrogen while situations requiring both K and Mg can be fertilized with potassium magnesium sulfate.

Like phosphorous, K is expressed as the oxide form (K2) on a fertilizer analysis. Be sure to carefully read soil test analysis and recommendations to determine whether K is expressed in the elemental or oxide form. To convert from one to the other, use the following formulas: K x 1.2 = K20; K20 x 0.83 = K.

Potassium fertilizers are usually broadcast and only on soils with a low level of K or high K fixation. Fine textured soils which do not easily leach K may be deficient in the lower soil levels with deep rooted crops. Where K deficiency is suspected and the upper soil layer contains adequate K, sampling the lower level is advised. Deep application would be necessary to incorporate the K where the deficiency exists.

High K losses due to leaching occur only on sandy soils, organic soils and certain clay mineral soils. Treat these soils just before planting to reduce losses during excessive rainy periods. For some situations, split applications will provide more efficient use of the fertilizer from a plant and economic standpoint.

Source Long Island Horticulture News
By: Scott Clark, Cornell Cooperative Extension

 Table of Contents

2000 Easter Lily Schedule

Easter: April 23, 2000 Due to the lateness of Easter 2000, growers must be careful not to force the crop too early. If storage is necessary, lower greenhouse temperatures and shade the structure. If refrigeration is used, lilies can be successfully stored at 31°F without lights.

Place plants in the greenhouse when the earliest bud is swollen ("puffy") and just ready to crack open. Treatment for Botrytis may be necessary. Keep the growing mix moist at all times.

 Table of Contents


Understanding the Value of Diagnosing Turfgrass Diseases and the Importance of Proper Sampling

Damaged turfgrass can be caused by a multitude of factors. Determining the cause of such damage is essential in developing and practicing successful turfgrass health management. Turfgrass diseases are caused by microscopic organisms that often have complex life cycles and reproductive strategies. Identification of these pathogens is necessary in determining the proper course of action. Control methods can be time consuming and costly, both valuable commodities that cannot be wasted. Using the Plant Disease Diagnostic Clinic at Cornell University to learn if your problem is caused by a plant pathogen can help you make the right choices in your turfgrass disease management practices. Often symptoms may be caused by an abiotic or non-living factor, such as too much rain, salt injury, freezing or hot temperatures, and/or herbicides. Knowledge of this allows you to address these factors culturally not chemically.

Proper sampling is extremely important in obtaining an accurate diagnosis. When collecting a sample for submission, be sure to include intact plants and provide a good amount of plant material. A sample that contains root, crown, and leaf tissue enables the diagnostician to develop a complete picture of the problem during the analysis. Using a cup cutter to collect samples provides the diagnostician with a nice sized sample with which to work. Always wrap the sample in a paper bag and package it in a sturdy box. Plastic packaging material may cause the sample to heat up in transit and it often increases the humidity, promoting the growth of other organisms. It is important to collect the sample prior to any pesticide applications. This point is extremely important. Once pesticides have been applied it may be difficult to obtain an accurate diagnosis. Collect the sample from an area that has early symptoms of the problem the problem. Areas that are completely dead often contain a number of secondary organisms that could complicate the detection of the primary pathogen.

Nematodes are becoming increasingly important as turfgrass pathogens. These pathogens are microscopic worms that feed on the root systems of turfgrass plants. The best time of year for nematode analysis is during the active growing season. A minimum of 6 soil samples, approximately 1" in diameter and 4" in depth, should be collected from the affected area. The samples should be collected randomly throughout the area, then mixed together thoroughly and about a pint of this soil mixture transferred to a plastic bag for submission to the Clinic. Mail the sample as quickly as possible! If the sample cannot be mailed immediately, keep it refrigerated or out of direct sunlight.

After all this work, don't forget to provide the Clinic with site and plant information. Our sample submission form* illustrates the type of information we need. However, If you don't have one available be sure to include a detailed letter. Include a description of the problem (photographs are helpful) and indicate the plant species involved at the site. Describe the symptoms. For example, are the plants wilting, yellowing, and/or spotty? Is only one type of grass being affected? What is the soil type and how is the drainage? Are the symptoms distributed across a large area, in a high area, in a low area, or only in the shade? List any and all pesticides and fertilizers that have been applied to the site.

The Plant Disease Diagnostic Clinic is designed to provide you with diagnostic and educational services. Please feel free to contact the Clinic with any questions prior to your sample submission. The Clinic staff work hard to provide you with fast, accurate results. Providing answers to your important questions prior to sample submission may enable us to get you the answers you need on a more timely basis.

*Note: The sample submission form and submission guidelines can be found on the Clinic website (PlantClinic.cornell.edu), or contact Karen Sirois at the Plant Disease Diagnostic Clinic, Cornell University, 334 Plant Science Building, Ithaca, NY 14853.

John A. Farfaglia
Extension Educator

Table of Contents
CCE-Niagara Home Page | Horticulture News
Document Created: January 6, 2000
Last Updated: January 7, 2000
/ Cornell Cooperative Extension / Cornell Cooperative Extension of Niagara County